Telepeer

Supreme Court rules Concord man can’t trademark ‘Trump too small’

June 13, 2024

By MARK SHERMAN | Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.”

National Politics |

Supreme Court preserves access to widely used abortion medication

National Politics |

Supreme Court has a lot of work to do and little time to do it with a sizable case backlog

National Politics |

Supreme Court justices Alito and Roberts discuss politically sensitive topics in secret recordings

National Politics |

Justice Samuel Alito won’t recuse himself from cases on Trump, Jan 6, amid flag controversy

National Politics |

Louisiana legislature classifies abortion pill as controlled substance

The justices upheld the government’s decision to deny a trademark to Steve Elster, an attorney from Concord, Calif., who sought exclusive use of the phrase on T-shirts and potentially other merchandise.

Government officials said the phrase “Trump too small” could still be used, just not trademarked because Trump had not consented to its use. Indeed, “Trump too small” T-shirts can already be purchased online.

Elster’s lawyers had argued that the decision violated his free speech rights, and a federal appeals court agreed.

At arguments, Chief Justice John Roberts said that if Elster were to win, people would race to trademark “Trump too this, Trump too that.”

Although all nine justices agreed in rejecting Elster’s First Amendment claim, they used differing rationales that stretched over 53 pages of opinions.

Twice in the past six years, the justices have struck down provisions of federal law denying trademarks seen as scandalous or immoral in one case and disparaging in another.

Elster’s case dealt with another measure calling for a trademark request to be refused if it involves a name, portrait or signature “identifying a particular living individual” unless the person has given “written consent.”

The phrase at the heart of the case is a reference to an exchange Trump had during the 2016 presidential campaign with Sen. Marco Rubio, who was then also running for the Republican presidential nomination.

Rubio began the verbal jousting when he told supporters at a rally that Trump was always calling him “little Marco” but that Trump — who says he is 6-foot-3 — has disproportionately small hands. “Have you seen his hands? … And you know what they say about men with small hands,” Rubio said. “You can’t trust them.”

Trump then brought up the comment at a televised debate on March 3, 2016.

“Look at those hands. Are they small hands? And he referred to my hands — if they’re small, something else must be small. I guarantee you there’s no problem. I guarantee you,” he said.

It is one of several cases at the court relating to former President Donald Trump, including major cases related to the violent attack on the Capitol in 2021. Earlier this term, the court laid out standards for when public officials can be sued for blocking critics from their social media accounts. These cases were also related to Trump.

Orange County Register

News Details

Supreme Court rules Concord man can’t trademark ‘Trump too small’

Related Articles

News

CONTACT INFO

QUICK LINKS

SERVICES

CURRENT NEWS